Discover how debunking neuromyths and using brain-based strategies can improve teaching and boost student learning outcomes.
Recommendation
What Are Neuromyths and Why Are They a Problem?
Neuromyths are inaccurate claims about how the brain works. Despite being disproven, many of these ideas continue to shape how educators teach. For example, claims such as “we only use 10% of our brain” or the idea that each person has a fixed learning style (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) continue to appear in classrooms, teacher training programs, and educational materials.
Common Neuromyths in Schools:
- People are either “left-brained” or “right-brained”
- Students must be taught according to their preferred learning style
- Only a small part of the brain is active during learning
- Brain development only happens during fixed "critical periods"
Key Findings: Why These Myths Persist and What to Do
1. False Brain Beliefs Are Widespread in Education
A global study showed that over 68% of teachers believed in one or more common neuromyths, even among those with advanced education in neuroscience (Rousseau, 2021). This suggests a strong need for better training in how the brain actually works.
2. Myths Distract from What Actually Works
3. Learning Involves the Entire Brain
Brain research shows that both hemispheres are active during learning. The idea that logical tasks only happen on the left side and creative tasks on the right is not true. Effective instruction supports activity across many regions of the brain at once (Shin et al., 2022).
4. Training in Brain Science Helps Teachers Avoid Misconceptions
Workshops and courses that cover the science of learning can reduce belief in false ideas. In one study, teacher candidates were much less likely to believe in myths after targeted training sessions (McMahon et al., 2019).
5. Working Together Across Disciplines Improves Teaching
When educators, scientists, and psychologists share information, teachers gain a better understanding of which practices are supported by research. Programs that include neuroscience as part of teacher preparation show strong results in aligning classroom methods with research (Torrijos-Muelas et al., 2021).
Why Real Neuroscience Matters in the Classroom
Using insights from brain research helps educators:
- Detect false claims that may appear in educational resources
- Use strategies that match how memory and attention work
- Design learning experiences that help students of all backgrounds succeed
Practical Actions for Schools and Educators
Challenge | Recommended Action |
Teachers believe false brain theories | Provide accurate neuroscience content during training and professional development |
Ineffective methods are still common | Promote research-based strategies that align with how memory, attention, and learning work |
Misleading content spreads in schools | Encourage schools to use vetted resources and avoid programs that push outdated claims |
Teacher education lacks brain science | Include brain research in pre-service teacher programs and ongoing workshops |
If you found this article useful, remember to share it with your network.
Explore this topic and other solutions at Rhizome.ca
🚨 Free Research Guide for 2025
Artificial Intelligence in Education: Key Themes, Challenges, and Opportunities
How is AI actually being used in education right now?
What do instructors, institutions, and policymakers need to prepare for?
This professionally designed guide answers those questions with real-world research across:
✅ Personalized learning and adaptive instruction
✅ Automated grading, feedback, and academic monitoring
✅ Teacher readiness and AI literacy
✅ Data privacy, fairness, and equity concerns
✅ Specialized use in medicine, libraries, sports, and cybersecurity
📚 Ideal for: educators, curriculum designers, edtech professionals, and graduate students
📥 Download the free PDF instantly
Related Research
This article addresses common misconceptions in education, such as the "left-brain/right-brain" theory and learning styles, and emphasizes the importance of integrating scientifically validated neuroeducation principles to enhance teaching effectiveness and student outcomes.
Explores how insights from educational neuroscience can inform teaching practices by aligning them with brain development and cognitive processes, leading to improved student engagement and learning outcomes.
Discusses the application of neuroscience research to enhance students' cognitive functions, including memory, attention, and problem-solving abilities, through evidence-based teaching strategies.
Expand your knowledge and skills. Explore our Courses
Related Research
- Effect of Neuromyth Training on Teacher Practice
Studies how professional development in neuroscience can reduce belief in brain myths and improve instructional choices.
- Persistence of Learning Styles Misconceptions
Investigates why the"learning styles" theory continues to influence teaching despite a lack of scientific evidence.
- Neuroscience-Informed Curriculum Design
Explores how validated brain research can be applied to curriculum development to enhance student engagement and retention.
- Brain Hemisphere Activity and Learning Processes
Examines how both hemispheres of the brain contribute to cognitive tasks, refuting the left-brain/right-brain myth.
- Impact of Neuroeducation on Student Achievement
Assesses how integrating neuroscience into teacher education correlates with improved student performance.
- Collaboration Between Educators and Neuroscientists
Analyzes the benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary partnerships for developing effective classroom strategies.
- Cognitive Load Theory in Classroom Settings
Applies the principles of cognitive load management to improve lesson design and reduce student overload.
- Marketing of Brain-Based Products in Education
Critiques how commercial programs misuse neuroscience terms or brain imagery to promote unproven methods.
- Prevalence of Pseudoscientific Beliefs in Teacher Training
Reviews teacher education materials for scientific accuracy and the presence of unsupported claims.
- Use of Retrieval Practice and Spaced Learning
Investigates memory-based learning strategies backed by neuroscience and their effectiveness in real classrooms.
Works Cited
McMahon, K., Yeh,
C. S.‐H., & Etchells, P. J. (2019). The impact of a modified
initial teacher education on challenging trainees' understanding of
neuromyths.
Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(4), 288–297.
https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12219
Torrijos-Muelas, M., González-Víllora, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The persistence of neuromyths in educational settings: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 591923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
.png)